<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Argument for Aging in Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/</link>
	<description>Helping Families Build a New Lifetime of Memories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:14:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Calvert</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Calvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-703</guid>
		<description>After caring for my mother Evelyn Calvert, 6 yrs at home after a large stroke I placed her in a Sun Healthcare nursing home -Sunbridge in Newport Beach, Calif. She died due to Sun&#039;s blatant disregard for human life.When families complained SUN was breaking Calif.&#039;s minimum nursing staffing laws and violating SUN&#039;s Calif state injunction by understaffing with broken equipment, the corporate powers that be, flew in regional employees to intimidate us by posting visiting hours signs giving us 1 hour after a normal work week to visit your loved ones each week day. Regional employee Julie Campbell was sent by their CEO to aplogize personally for SUN when their broken blood pressure monitor caused my mother to have a stroke when they neglected to give her meds. I have written documents from a board member acknowledging equipment was inoperable for months yet they were still not ready to respond to the critical situation. Due to the fact SUN was under a state injunction from 2001 for having the same broken equipment in a Burlingame, Calif facility that killed patients, this ACT or lack of action, was willful misconduct, reason for termination for good cause by it&#039;s board of director&#039;s (and making me eligible for treble damages -I was a huge liability to SUN). For that reason the powers that be prevented that triple compensation. After major surgery my attorney rushed me into mediation while still recovering, lied to me about the law, coerced, intimidated and threatened me into signing an agreement for damages based solely on SUN’s fraud. He dropped wrongful death while I was distracted and ill. When I regained my strength, I sued for malpractice, he died 2 weeks later, sadly. I won that case in 2008. I refused to sign a confidentialty agreement after mediaiton -after being told that SUN’s CEO was on the phone from his Irvine office with attorneys in the other room and that he would harm me if I forced this case to trial. SUN cheated the taxpayers of the State of Calif out of millions of dollars in fines and according to Claude Vanderwold deputy attorney general this facility was NOT considered in the fine of $2.5 Million in Sept 2005 against Sun for violating the injunction to date. The Dept of Justice turned a blind eye. The Dept of Health didn’t fine the usual $100,000 for her or any other&#039;s death.Yet SUN’s own medical director, Dr Scott Stoney says SUN was responsible for her death and he quit due to SUN’s lack of response.Political corruption? Corporate corruption?This is not rocket science, Buzz would say.Deborah Calvert, Newport Beach, Calif. former asst. to Buzz Aldrin 
debdeb2080@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After caring for my mother Evelyn Calvert, 6 yrs at home after a large stroke I placed her in a Sun Healthcare nursing home -Sunbridge in Newport Beach, Calif. She died due to Sun&#8217;s blatant disregard for human life.When families complained SUN was breaking Calif.&#8217;s minimum nursing staffing laws and violating SUN&#8217;s Calif state injunction by understaffing with broken equipment, the corporate powers that be, flew in regional employees to intimidate us by posting visiting hours signs giving us 1 hour after a normal work week to visit your loved ones each week day. Regional employee Julie Campbell was sent by their CEO to aplogize personally for SUN when their broken blood pressure monitor caused my mother to have a stroke when they neglected to give her meds. I have written documents from a board member acknowledging equipment was inoperable for months yet they were still not ready to respond to the critical situation. Due to the fact SUN was under a state injunction from 2001 for having the same broken equipment in a Burlingame, Calif facility that killed patients, this ACT or lack of action, was willful misconduct, reason for termination for good cause by it&#8217;s board of director&#8217;s (and making me eligible for treble damages -I was a huge liability to SUN). For that reason the powers that be prevented that triple compensation. After major surgery my attorney rushed me into mediation while still recovering, lied to me about the law, coerced, intimidated and threatened me into signing an agreement for damages based solely on SUN’s fraud. He dropped wrongful death while I was distracted and ill. When I regained my strength, I sued for malpractice, he died 2 weeks later, sadly. I won that case in 2008. I refused to sign a confidentialty agreement after mediaiton -after being told that SUN’s CEO was on the phone from his Irvine office with attorneys in the other room and that he would harm me if I forced this case to trial. SUN cheated the taxpayers of the State of Calif out of millions of dollars in fines and according to Claude Vanderwold deputy attorney general this facility was NOT considered in the fine of $2.5 Million in Sept 2005 against Sun for violating the injunction to date. The Dept of Justice turned a blind eye. The Dept of Health didn’t fine the usual $100,000 for her or any other&#8217;s death.Yet SUN’s own medical director, Dr Scott Stoney says SUN was responsible for her death and he quit due to SUN’s lack of response.Political corruption? Corporate corruption?This is not rocket science, Buzz would say.Deborah Calvert, Newport Beach, Calif. former asst. to Buzz Aldrin<br />
<a href="mailto:debdeb2080@hotmail.com">debdeb2080@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply, Raad.  That is incredibly helpful info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, Raad.  That is incredibly helpful info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raad Ghantous</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Raad Ghantous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeanne...it is indeed a subject that we should all embrace more in the days to come regardless what industry we might be in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeanne&#8230;it is indeed a subject that we should all embrace more in the days to come regardless what industry we might be in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raad Ghantous</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Raad Ghantous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Matt thanks for your kind words.

The first step differs if one is talking about A.D.A verses Universal Design in that A.D.A sets out tomodify the built environment to make it accessible for people with disabilities while Universal Design is more inclusive and sets out to make all spaces  inherently, and even possibly intuativly, accessible for all users regardless of age, mobility, visual, auditory or mental ability etc.

True your/our first concern must be compliance with ADA guidelines and laws. But ADA guidelines are really if you will the minimums of, or as you put it the &quot;first step&quot; towards  universal design which is a more holistic/wellness way of thinking about not only the built environment but pretty much anything we use or interact with. 

The ideal is to design for different situations, built places, products and even services that are better able to serve a wide range of people...and hopefully ALL people! The core assumption being that a design that is easier for someone with a disability will be also  easier for everybody. 

Here is a useful link for ADA guidelines for buildings &amp; facilities you might find handy :

http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm

Finally, try to think of universal design as not only the right thing to do, but how it also maybe the trend of what consumers will expect as the number of Boomers grows making it not from a business prospective also the smart thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt thanks for your kind words.</p>
<p>The first step differs if one is talking about A.D.A verses Universal Design in that A.D.A sets out tomodify the built environment to make it accessible for people with disabilities while Universal Design is more inclusive and sets out to make all spaces  inherently, and even possibly intuativly, accessible for all users regardless of age, mobility, visual, auditory or mental ability etc.</p>
<p>True your/our first concern must be compliance with ADA guidelines and laws. But ADA guidelines are really if you will the minimums of, or as you put it the &#8220;first step&#8221; towards  universal design which is a more holistic/wellness way of thinking about not only the built environment but pretty much anything we use or interact with. </p>
<p>The ideal is to design for different situations, built places, products and even services that are better able to serve a wide range of people&#8230;and hopefully ALL people! The core assumption being that a design that is easier for someone with a disability will be also  easier for everybody. </p>
<p>Here is a useful link for ADA guidelines for buildings &amp; facilities you might find handy :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm</a></p>
<p>Finally, try to think of universal design as not only the right thing to do, but how it also maybe the trend of what consumers will expect as the number of Boomers grows making it not from a business prospective also the smart thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raad Ghantous</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Raad Ghantous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Thanks Laura.. I agree with you completely about the importance of a &quot;Aging Will&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Laura.. I agree with you completely about the importance of a &#8220;Aging Will&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCAMichigan (Rob Louis-Ferdinand)</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>HCAMichigan (Rob Louis-Ferdinand)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-585</guid>
		<description>There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCAFranchise (Jack Johnson)</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>HCAFranchise (Jack Johnson)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-541</guid>
		<description>RT @ drkathyjohnson.There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @ drkathyjohnson.There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drkathyjohnson (Dr. Kathy Johnson)</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>drkathyjohnson (Dr. Kathy Johnson)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-542</guid>
		<description>There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many reasons that 9 out of 10 American seniors want to live at home. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nrphgp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Bramly</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Bramly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Great article.

Regarding the potential for taking on aging in place as a health care strategy for a state, that&#039;s exactly what I think it needs to be. Perhaps you know which country, but there is SOME country in Northern Europe that, as a national healthcare strategy, assists people in aging in their homes no matter what their health issues (even dementia) by bringing all the services to them. I read it in an article that I didn&#039;t keep and am now desperately trying to figure out which country it is... I think that living in a community such as assisted living or a nursing home has the potential for healthier socialization for people, but that&#039;s about where it ends.

Second, I am an advocate for planning for one&#039;s future, and recommend that people create an &quot;aging will&quot; similar to a living will, for what they want to have happen as they age. The aging will, created in saner times and in partnership with family members, is what they and the family refer back to if a crisis happens and decisions such as where to live need to be made.

Second</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>Regarding the potential for taking on aging in place as a health care strategy for a state, that&#8217;s exactly what I think it needs to be. Perhaps you know which country, but there is SOME country in Northern Europe that, as a national healthcare strategy, assists people in aging in their homes no matter what their health issues (even dementia) by bringing all the services to them. I read it in an article that I didn&#8217;t keep and am now desperately trying to figure out which country it is&#8230; I think that living in a community such as assisted living or a nursing home has the potential for healthier socialization for people, but that&#8217;s about where it ends.</p>
<p>Second, I am an advocate for planning for one&#8217;s future, and recommend that people create an &#8220;aging will&#8221; similar to a living will, for what they want to have happen as they age. The aging will, created in saner times and in partnership with family members, is what they and the family refer back to if a crisis happens and decisions such as where to live need to be made.</p>
<p>Second</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.insideeldercare.com/aging-in-place/the-argument-for-aging-in-place/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insideeldercare.com/?p=1398#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Raad,  Insightful article.  What is the most sensible first step in creating a safe A.D.A/ Barrier-free/ Universal design home for seniors?  Thanks...Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raad,  Insightful article.  What is the most sensible first step in creating a safe A.D.A/ Barrier-free/ Universal design home for seniors?  Thanks&#8230;Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
